Fountain, Colorado Car Accident Lawyers

Results Are the Only Thing That Matters

10,000 Clients Served | Millions in Settlements

Free Consultation

Fountain, Colorado Car Accident Law Firm

Even though traffic in Fountain is not as severe as it is in other big cities, the area’s roadways are far from safe. Even though traffic accidents have decreased lately, the number of motor car deaths has risen to new highs. While this is in line with national trends, Fountain drivers face additional dangers due to particular risk factors.

While Colorado’s roadways are not the most deadly in the country, they are riskier than the national average. Even without the rain and terrible weather that endangers cars in other states, this is a dangerous situation.

Here are some of the factors that contribute to car accidents in Fountain, including those that are unique to our city and region:

TRAFFIC CONGESTION FROM HEAVY TRUCKS

When it comes to truck traffic, Fountain is in the middle. The city is located between Pueblo and Denver, two important population concentrations. Trucks also pass through Colorado on their route to the rest of the nation from the Mexican border. In Fountain, truck traffic has been consistent, and it has just lately grown.

Because of the development of internet purchasing, there are much more trucks on the road now than there were before. Trucking businesses are unable to find enough drivers to transport their cargo.

Retail behemoths like Walmart and Amazon have erected enormous new distribution centers in Colorado, increasing truck traffic. Casa Grande, about an hour south of Fountain, is home to one of the world’s biggest Walmart distribution hubs. You’re probably correct if you think Walmart trucks are everywhere.

All increased truck traffic increases the dangers for drivers, particularly when those drivers are inexperienced and undertrained. Drivers must share the road with these massive trucks, which may weigh up to 25 times as much as their cars.

Many of these trucks go directly through Fountain, clogging up roadways and requiring additional caution from drivers. Truck drivers can’t always see out of their blind areas, but that doesn’t stop them from rushing to make up time and get more miles under their belts before stopping to rest.

HIGHWAY HAZARDS

In terms of fatalities, statistics reveal that Colorado’s metropolitan roadways are significantly more hazardous than the typical highway. In the Valley, there were 207 deadly accidents on motorways in the last two years. One every five days is the result of this.

According to one research, Colorado’s metropolitan roads and freeways had a 61 per cent higher fatality rate than the national average.

These figures are perplexing since Colorado’s metropolitan highways are normally broad. Authorities in the city may increase I-10 to eight lanes. Highways with a lot of lanes, on the other hand, although lowering traffic, promote unsafe driving habits. These, in particular, entail excessive speeding and erratic lane changes. I-17, which runs north of Fountain, is often included among the most hazardous routes in the country.

Highway accidents in Colorado are caused more by irresponsible Driving than by traffic. According to statistics, half of the traffic deaths on these highways occur between Friday and Sunday, when traffic is less. While you have power over your conduct, you do not influence another driver’s indifference to your safety.

UNACQUAINTED DRIVERS ON CITY AND SUBURBAN ROADS

One thing the Fountain region has in abundance is highways. Despite an expanding public transportation infrastructure, the Valley is a car lover’s paradise. Aside from that, Fountain is a sprawling metropolis due to its ability to grow into the desert regularly.

Just in Fountain, there are approximately 5,000 miles of highways. This excludes highways in Scottsdale, Tempe, Gilbert, and other nearby communities.

As a result, while driving on such a large network of roads, drivers lower likelihood of understanding where they are headed. There’s a good probability they’ll be on unknown territory, trying to figure out where they’re heading. Because they might miss stop signs and red lights, lost drivers are risky.

Trying to figure out where they’re heading and pausing to glance at their phones for directions may cause them to get distracted. Being disoriented might also damage their attention and capacity to cope with unexpected risks.

The advent of ridesharing businesses has increased the number of distracted and missing drivers. Many Uber and Lyft drivers spend their days navigating unknown routes to make ends meet. They’re trying to figure out where they’re headed with one eye on their app.

CONGESTED INTERSECTIONS

Fountain has broader highways than many older cities with greater traffic since it is a younger city. While this may make things simpler for drivers driving in one direction, turning becomes much more difficult. This is particularly true when a junction is within a mile of a highway (and Fountain has many highways). Cars tend to back up when this occurs, making it even more difficult to pass through an intersection and turn.

Some of Fountain’ principal roadways can handle 60,000 to 80,000 cars each day. Camelback and McDowell Roadways are two of the busiest roads in the area. There is an average of over 20,000 collisions at crossroads each year in the Fountain region because junctions here are busier than in other cities.

Drivers often underestimate the size of the junction and the amount of time they have to turn. Other motorists may run red lights, either because they were not aware of them or attempting to pass through them.

ZONES OF CONSTANT CONSTRUCTION

While most of the Fountain region seems to be new, the infrastructure is old enough to need maintenance. This is particularly true given the area’s extensive road network.

The city of Fountain is in the middle of a five-year road-repair effort. The city recently enacted legislation that increased the number of route miles in its maintenance program by thrice. Both major roads and city streets are always under development.

The city of Fountain’ roads are in poor condition, and it will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to repair them. Only approximately a third of the roads in the region are deemed in good condition. Colorado is dedicated to repairing the roads in the region, but this will need virtually constant work.

Even on city streets, work zones will pose a risk to people going through due to abrupt changes in traffic conditions and restricted lanes. In work zones, other drivers who do not slow down or pay attention create accidents that injury or kill other cars obeying the regulations.

ANGRY MOTORISTS

In addition, there is a serious road rage pandemic in Colorado. The situation has only become worse in recent years as drivers have become significantly more aggressive behind the wheel. These motorists will be out of control, driving dangerously and endangering other motorists. In the Fountain region, there have been several accidents of road rage shootings.

To cause injury to another person, a motorist does not need to use violence. In an attempt to gain the final word in a road conflict, some drivers may tailgate or drive aggressively.

Tailgating may result in a rear-end collision. Another driver may lose control of their car as a result of aggressive Driving. It can injury other drivers and passengers in the region who had nothing to do with the first occurrence.

THE FOUNTAIN HEAT ARE A TEAM FROM FOUNTAIN, COLORADO.

While there is no rain or snow in Fountain in the summer, the heat may make driving even riskier. During the scorching days of a Fountain summer, drivers are not at their best.

According to one research, drivers are about 3% more likely to be involved in an car collision during a heatwave (the entire Fountain spring and summer is considered a heatwave).

On very hot days, driver performance degrades. According to the same research, a driver performance mistake had a 7 per cent greater likelihood of triggering an accident on exceptionally hot days.

When drivers are tired and tired from driving in great temperatures, they are more prone to make mistakes. It doesn’t matter whether Fountain drivers are acclimated to the heat; it may still exhaust them on days when the temperature exceeds 100 degrees.

Aside from the variables peculiar to Fountain that cause accidents, drivers in the region face the same dangers as drivers in other cities when it comes to car accidents. We’ll go through some of these dangers in more detail below.

DRIVING WHILE DISTRACTED

Many individuals attribute the surge in car accident mortality to the smartphone’s introduction. This is a significant source of traffic risk. Because they were looking down on their road rather than focusing on it, drivers may miss stop signs or deviate out of their lane. In a matter of seconds, an car may travel the length of a football field. It takes the same amount of time to send a text message. Cars cannot use their brakes to prevent rear-ending cars in front of them, nor can they escape threats in their immediate vicinity.

This not only increases the likelihood of a collision but also makes car accidents significantly more deadly.

Distracted Driving includes more than just cell phones. Instead of maintaining both hands on the wheel and eyes on the road, people engage in routine driving tasks. This includes activities such as eating and applying cosmetics. Over 3,000 persons were murdered in distracted driving accidents throughout the country in a single year.

DRUNK DRIVING IS A SERIOUS OFFENCE.

Among terms of DUI fatalities as a proportion of overall motor car deaths, Colorado is in the top half of the states. DUI fatalities in Colorado are greater than the national average. This is one of the reasons why there are more highway traffic fatalities on weekends in Colorado than during weekday peak hours. While Colorado has harsh DUI penalties, it does not prevent individuals from driving intoxicated in the state.

Drivers’ response times are slowed by alcohol, and they cannot notice what is going on around them. Because they have lost their inhibitions and judgement, some intoxicated drivers will take significantly greater risks. As a consequence, unsafe Driving and excessive speeding occur.

DRIVING WHILE TIRED

Driving after not getting enough rest might be just as hazardous as driving while inebriated. It is the same as driving with blood alcohol concentration.08 when motorists have been awake for more than 20 hours (the legal limit). Fatigued Driving also slows a driver’s reflexes and prevents them from reacting to what is going on around them on the road.

Truck drivers are especially vulnerable to this issue. Even though federal restrictions limit the amount of time they may drive, they may not get enough sleep. A qualified driver with all of their reflexes and wits about them must operate a huge and fully loaded truck.

JEREMY D. EARLE, JD, A FOUNTAIN CAR ACCIDENT LAWYER, IS SPEEDING

Fountain drivers are encouraged to drive fast on the lengthy motorways and multi- lane roadways despite the speed limitations. Even harsh punishments for irresponsible Driving and speeding have not affect them. Speed-related accidents killed 281 people last

year, while over 3,000 people were injured.

Speeding is the third most prevalent cause of car accidents in the United States. When drivers speed, they cannot stop when they need to, and they risk losing control of their car.

Other motorists who follow the prescribed speed limit find themselves in the wrong location at the wrong time. Even when listed speed limits are lower, the issue is just as acute on city roadways. It may be made worse by the knowledge that other drivers in the area are likely to have been injured.

These are just a few of the numerous factors that contribute to car accidents in Fountain. If you want legal help, you should always contact a Fountain car accident attorney.

Free Consultation 

In Person | Phone | Zoom

The Foundation of Car Accident Claims in Colorado

BASIC CONCEPTS BEHIND THE PERSONAL INJURY TORT SYSTEM

Many people may be surprised to learn that England, America, Canada, and Australia are among the few nations globally with a legal system that compensates victims via monetary damages.

Similarly, these nations are one of a kind in that they have a system in which a “jury of peers judges civil cases.” There are numerous flaws in the system that have been well documented, and to a large extent exaggerated, in the public media; however, the proof is in the pudding: the United States has the most stable legal system in the world, and the world “banks” its money in the United States largely as a result.

The term “torts” simply refers to the part of a law that deals with the responsibility (fault) of individuals and businesses to other individuals and businesses for injury to person (body) and/or property caused by negligence (carelessness.) Every first-year law student takes two semesters of “torts,” which covers topics such as defamation, pollution (toxic torts), drug and medical device injuries, malpractice, fires, and product flaws, among others (e.g. cars that are unsafe.)

Although civil unrest, military coups, revolutions, and other forms of instability are conceivable in the United States, they are much less likely to occur here than any other nation. Why? I believe it is primarily because we have a judicial system that handles civil issues in the courts in a way that the public generally trusts.

There have been a few occasions in the history of our court system when jurors have been “bribed” or otherwise compromised, but jurors in civil matters are not “bought off” in the great majority of cases. People know this because ordinary individuals (i.e., regular people) have all been asked to serve on juries and have learned through their own experiences and the experiences of their friends and family that the jury system is not rigged. Consider this: in how many other nations has this ever been the case?

On a fundamental human, moral level, we all understand that if you injure someone, you should pay them in some manner to make things right. While in ancient times, and even now in many cultures, the method to balance the scales was to actually “take an eye for an eye,” the English system of justice determined hundreds of years ago that it was more suitable to utilize monetary damages rather than “taking an eye for an eye.” The English also learned that having a jury determine things was the best way to ensure that decisions were made fairly and not by those who might be “bribed.” (Although juries were first made up of solely male landowners, the system developed.) In the United States today, no one may be barred from serving on a jury because of their money, ethnicity, sex, or religion.)

I am not the first to point out that there is another facet to the civil system. The jury not only decides compensation in civil matters but also serves as a “conscience of the society.” It is their responsibility to make Fountain a safer environment. If people who are travelling on the highway.

They will be more careful, and the streets will be safer if they know that the penalty for, say, speeding and causing an accident could be more than just a traffic ticket (which in Fountain currently costs between $150 and $350 for a moving violation), but could also subject you to having to pay money out of pocket, via having very high insurance rates for several years (a total cost much more than the ticket). People drive more cautiously when they know it will “cost them in the money” if they drive dangerously. Even if they are unconcerned about the well-being of street children, they will be concerned about their wallets!

If we didn’t have a mechanism to enforce safety regulations by assessing civil damages, the rules would be meaningless; they wouldn’t have the ‘teeth’ to make people pay attention. It would be like certain sorts of replacement school instructors who want pupils to follow but can’t since there isn’t a civil justice system that genuinely enforces the safety standards.

Students believe that the replacement is attempting to prevent any potential controversy by avoiding the creation of documentation.

As a result, when the replacement teacher arrives, the classroom is transformed into a “playground.” It would be as if the substitute teacher was in control of the classroom every day if we didn’t have a system where the “conscience of the community,” i.e., the jury, enforced safe driving regulations.

By the way, this ‘community conscience’ nonsense was not invented by me. These ideas have been improved and beautifully polished for use in the courtroom by the “reptile” group of attorneys created by Atlanta’s prominent lawyer Don Keenan and Duke University’s Prof.

David Ball. Many of the notions discussed in this book, especially those related to juror/trial psychology, are credited. As a result, most of what the “reptile” has to say about things is based on the work of Moe Levine, a legendary trial lawyer from decades ago. Lawyers in the know still buy videos of him and copies of his closing arguments, as well as paper versions of his lectures. A competent lawyer rests on the shoulders of great attorneys, and Levine most likely acquired his ideas from someone else.

Suppose you’re a new plaintiff’s lawyer who wants to get a head start on knowing out how civil juries work. In that case, I highly suggest looking at the excellent books available from Trial Guides (which publishes the basic Reptile text and the Rules of the Road volumes by the same author).

Pat Malone and Rick Friedman), and the AAJ volumes on the Jury Bias Project. These books will not provide you with the “secret sauce,” but they will put you in the correct direction.

Note that just reading the first few paragraphs, or even worse, skimming them, will not provide you with the whole picture or even the most important portions of it. These are only the trailers for the movies, not the actual films. You’re

To really “understand” it, you’ll need to attend several out-of-town seminars and workshops,

as well as walk into the arena yourself a few dozen times.

I’d want everyone to consider what our society would be like if we didn’t have a civil tort system with jury trials demanding monetary penalties against people who endanger our safety by disobeying the laws. What if, in other words, the regulations were not enforced in a meaningful way? You just have to go a few hundred miles south of Fountain to find it.

Have any of you ever had the opportunity to drive in Mexico City or other Mexican cities? How cautious are the drivers? Have any of you ever had the “pleasure” of being involved in a car accident in Mexico? Mexico is the only country I’ve mentioned because of its closeness to Fountain. Today, the vast majority of other nations may be regarded to be in the same boat.

This chapter’s main takeaway is that the civil justice system for torts, particularly automotive lawsuits, should not be studied in law school.

Only attorneys and judges have a true grasp of what’s inside the mysterious black box known as the law,’ with only lawyers and judges genuinely comprehending what’s inside the mysterious black box known as the law.’ It’s more than that; to be honest, it’s primarily not.

Furthermore, jurors, despite being skewed against us by the Chamber of Commerce’s “frivolous lawsuit,” still have a deeper sense of community safety and balancing the scales for injurys and losses, which can transcend the insurance industry’s multitrillion-dollar “Macdonald’s coffee” and “doctors leaving the state” fake news mindset.

WHAT DO INSURANCE COMPANIES DO, AND WHY DO WE HAVE THEM?

Originally, “insurance firms” arose from a desire among commercial shipping businesses (many of which were located in Holland at the time) to share the risk of losing cargo on ships that were lost to storms and, I imagine, pirates. The ship owners would individually contribute money to a pool of cash, and if one of the ships went down, the pool would payout to the shipowner. This exchange was the predecessor of the well-known “Lloyds of London” market.

The concept is sound in theory: everyone contributes, and the risk is shared around. As time passes, we go from a nonprofit group of merchants sharing risk to a model of professional risk managers who evaluate risks and profit by ensuring that the quantity of claims paid out is less than the amount of money taken in.

There was a period when there were a lot of insurance-related organizations that were mostly nonprofit. These would-be organizations would ensure a certain group of people, such as government employees. Of course, the temptation for those at the top of such enterprises to accept lavish incomes and live lavish lives was always there. However, the nonprofit aspect of these organizations made them appealing to join since the rates were often lower than those of a completely for-profit business controlled by investors and vulnerable to Wall Street machinations.

Numerous such insurance groups, i.e., nonprofit risk pools, engaged in car insurance issues when I first practiced law. Today, such organizations are almost non-existent.

Companies that used to ensure specific groups of people (e.g., Geico used to ensure government employees, Horace Mann used to insure teachers, and USAA used to insure military members) have either gone out of business or changed so much that they are now only nonprofit or exclusionary in the broadest, i.e. phoniest, sense of the word. (For example, USAA has broadened the term of “service personnel and their families” to the point that few individuals are excluded.)

Insurance businesses have grown enormously successful, thanks in part to computer algorithms’ capacity to properly determine risk groupings, degrees of risk, and other factors. Many (if not all) car insurance firms in the United States are now controlled mostly by persons and investors from other nations.

It should come as no surprise to the reader that many of the flag-waving (on television advertising) American car insurance businesses are controlled by Saudi Arabian, Swiss, and other foreign conglomerates. The progressive insurance firm is fundamentally controlled by the famed Eastern European billionaire George Soros; Farmers is owned by a corporation located in Zurich, and so on. Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway hedge fund, in essence, owns Geico. Buffet’s hedge firm has amassed billions of dollars by investing Geico policyholders’ “float” money.

In principle, the concept of profit-driven insurance businesses is not inherently objectionable. The premise is that they will compete with one another, resulting in reduced rates due to the free market. Unfortunately, given the vast sums of money involved (trillions of dollars) and the enormous profits to be earned, such sums of money can potentially corrupt the ‘free market’ system and those who serve it.

Individual physicians, for example, are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, to submit “studies” accusing honest folks of being fakes and frauds. Lobbyists for insurance companies abound in every state legislature building, including Carson City, Colorado, and are major supporters of groups like the “Republican Attorneys General Association.” In my 40 years of work, I’ve witnessed insurance industry lobbyists and their lawyers get more arrogant, as if they’re “bulletproof,” and treat the interests of customers and their lawyers with growing contempt. Financial donations to state and federal lawmakers make the insurance business second only to the NRA.

But I’ve also seen the opposite side of the coin, namely, the government owning and controlling an insurance company. When I first started practicing law, the Colorado Insurance Commission, or NIC, was in charge of the state’s workers’ compensation system. Workman’s compensation was their monopoly.

The employees’ service was poor; in fact, it was quite slow. Essentially, no one cared as long as the paperwork was completed on time. However, this was probably preferable to the current workers’ compensation system, in which the amounts of profit and money are so large that there are specialized clinics and doctors, etc., who limit themselves to treating injured workers on behalf of insurance conglomerates, and who tend to turn injured workers into “targets” to be shot down with ever-nastier reports and insinuations.

On a workman’s compensation claim, do the insurance company’s bidding. The same may be said about physicians who sell a piece of their soul to auto insurance companies in exchange for “IME” tests and reports that say exactly what the insurance company wants them to say about persons whose only crime was being struck by a careless motorist.

As a result, there is no such thing as a flawless world. A government-controlled system is sluggish, laborious, and unsympathetic; a profit-driven system leads to corruption, with the financial incentive for unscrupulous “IME” doctors and “biomechanical engineers” to smear innocent victims.

The essential conclusion here is that insurance’s initial purpose of spreading risk is a good one. Allowing insurance companies to make profits is, in theory, a good idea (to encourage people and businesses to enter an industry that might otherwise be unappealing) if there were adequate and effective watchdogs who were not looking for jobs in the insurance industry after leaving their government positions.

People who have been injured in car accidents should be aware that insurance firms are not their allies. They’re in the business to earn money. People who work for insurance firms don’t care about claims; they’re there to advance their careers, and advancement is only possible if the insurance business makes money. Someone who expects anything different is, well, naïve.

Insurance companies use television commercials to try to persuade the public that they are caring, family-oriented businesses where agents and adjusters truly care about people and that “USAA has been a part of my family for three generations,” “Allstate is the good hand’s people,” and “USAA has been a part of my family for three generations.” “My State Farm agent is there to save me money,” “Farmers agents are there to guard you against loopholes since they’ve seen it all,” “Flo is your buddy,” “Geico is the nice, good-natured Gecko,” and so on.

Shame on you if you believe such rubbish. Insurance companies are not inherently bad, but they are in business to earn money, and they will attempt to get away with anything they can when no one is looking. They are there to benefit themselves, not you.

There’s a reason why the world’s wealthiest individuals, such as Warren Buffet and George Soros, have invested billions, if not the majority of their fortunes, in-car insurance businesses during the previous decade. It’s because, on this side of the legal marijuana sector, car insurance has become the most successful company.

Most Recent Car Accident Blog Articles

 

Warrior Car Accident Lawyers

1902 W. Colorado Ave., Suite 100

Colorado Springs, CO 80904

719-300-1100